Full text of article posted to Journal of the British Academy, volume 5, pp. 309-329.
Abstract: ‘We don’t torture’, announced both Bush and Obama. But what Bush meant as a statement of fact, Obama meant as a statement of resolve. Exploring this example, this article examines how moral resolutions work to overcome the rationalisations that temptation engenders. This in turn sheds light on the the nature of our moral concepts. Resolutions are typically framed using intentional notions (torture, murder, theft). Reflection on the reasons for this provides a new perspective on what is right, and what is wrong, about the doctrine of double effect.
Keywords: resolution, resolve, torture, doctrine of double effect, intentional, rationalisation.
Publication date: 16 Nov 2017
Author: Richard Holton
Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/005.309